The judge­ment – news from the future

18. October 2018

The defen­dant is senten­ced to two years’ driving ban with accom­pany­ing preven­tive detention for serious bodily injury. A three-month simul­ta­ne­ous trai­ning course and a digi­tal idiot test must be comple­ted before a driving licence can be issued. Despite the clear verdict, judges and prose­cu­tors are not enti­rely sure whether a serious miscar­riage of justice has taken place. In the dock was a self-driving car that had seriously inju­red a passer-by during an evas­ive mano­eu­vre. The owner of the car, who could not inter­vene, could not be reproa­ched, neit­her could the manu­fac­tu­rer, and the supplier of the licen­sed and certi­fied soft­ware could claim, just like the owner, not to have been directly invol­ved in the acci­dent.

Sounds kafka­es­que, but could become reality in the near future. Will there be such a thing as machine ethics until then? Will arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence also be able to learn to decide between good and evil, wrong and right? Can an intel­li­gent machine have emoti­ons, act morally? A compu­­ter-aided robot can work faster than any human being, can beat the world cham­pion in chess and program itself faster than the best IT specia­list could ever do. And yet he remains a machine, without feelings, emoti­ons or even mora­lity. But back to our accu­sed. For science and rese­arch, poli­tics and busi­ness, and not least for the judi­ciary, these are urgent ques­ti­ons that need to be answe­red soon.

Use of cookies
In order to optimize the website and to improve it continuously, ADVANEO uses cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to the use of cookies. Further information can be found in our privacy policy declaration.
-Click here to unsubscribe.